Fernando's Blog |
For this blog post, it is referenced from my final paper that regards to protect everybody's privacy by prohibiting drone use for registered sex offenders, felons, and people suffering from mental illness. People that are suffering from mental illness should not have the right to own drone due to the fact that their unpredictable from what occurs inside their mind and might directly physically act by the way of their thinking. People with mental illness tend to have abnormal and addictive behavior, which it’s a concern to allow them to operate a drone. The reason is that if people with mental illness use a drone to stalk someone and it becomes an addicting behavior, it can become an issue towards the victim and themselves since the person operating the drone has some unpredictable mix of emotions of whether it can become a greater problem from stalking into a further invasion of privacy case. Felons that have been convicted for stalking individuals and breaks a restraining order should not have the right to own a drone. When someone is known to be a convicted felon, it is difficult for society to accept them such as when they apply for jobs and trusting them. If a felon that was convicted for stalking and breaking a restraining order, the felon has to stay away from their victim and have no communication. As a result, it makes it impossible to allow felons to own drones since more likely felons will take advantage and use drones to continue to stalk people. The most important group of people that are a threat to society are registered sex offenders. Sex offenders are the kind of people that have no control of their wicked desires and will do anything to stalk for new victims. Sex offenders who are intent on committing further unlawful acts may use the vast capabilities of modern drone technology to target children. Sex offenders should be stripped from their rights to have possession of their drone due to possibly invading children’s privacy and their well-being. According to an academic journal, there is a case regarding an incident at North Carolina about a sex offender using a drone that was hovering around a crowd of fairgoers, which there were many children present and the police followed the drone and immediately arrested the sexual predator by the name of Matthew Kenning (Borden, 2017). Incidents like in Kenning’s case does raise concerns knowing that sex offenders are operating drones, which technology is being used as an advantage to spy on children. Parents do not want to worry about their children being monitored by sex offenders even when they’re not physically present. Sex offenders that own drones can easily monitor children in schools and on public park, which both places are supposed to be a safe environment and by the use of drones it is endangering children’s privacy. For more information click on this link.
0 Comments
Owning a smartphone is a blessing for all of us. Our smartphones are like mini computers that we rely on if we are browsing the internet and downloading software. Most importantly, smartphones are like any other phone, we can call or text. Unfortunately, we are addicted to our smartphones that we cannot leave our home without them and are a constant distraction in our daily life. We witness people that are constantly distracted from starring at their phones while walking on the sidewalk, roads, and stairs. The most important issue is when people are texting while driving. Texting while driving is the act of composing, sending, reading text messages, email, or making similar use of the web on a mobile phone while operating a motor vehicle. Every day, I am always behind the wheel and I always see other drivers distracted on their phones while driving especially when the driver is at a stoplight. Texting and driving has been a major cause of car accidents and running over pedestrians. As I read in an article from Edgar Snyder and Associates, there were some shocking statistics from people that text and drive. Each year, approximately 1.6 million crashes occur due to cell phone use. Nearly 330,000 injuries occur each year are caused by texting and driving. One out of every four car accidents in the United States is caused by texting and driving. If a driver is texting on the road, in about 5 seconds the driver is not paying attention other than their phone. The National Safety Council reports that texting while driving causes a 400 percent increase in time spent with eyes off the road. I was astonished by the statistics that I found interesting and I did not know about. Those are only a few statistics for texting and driving, but there are many more statistics that we might be aware, but not properly presented. Texting and driving conflicts with the ethical issues of Utilitarianism, and Deontology. Driving distracted goes against Utilitarianism because texting and driving does not maximize the greatest good, considering it can kill innocent people. Deontology goes out the window because texting and driving has been declared illegal in nearly every state, while most states now even make it illegal to be on a phone at all. One might argue in opposition that texting and driving is a part of virtue ethics, because many other people text and drive. There is another ethical issue for punishing people that text and drive, which is considered as invasion of privacy. Now we hear about undercover officers disguised as construction workers going to stop lights and stop signs to find drivers using their phones. Undercover officers use cameras to take pictures of driver’s license plates and use it to look up the drivers place of residence in order to send the ticket to the driver’s home address. Drivers that had been in that situation argue that they feel their privacy is being violated from the cameras that can easily give their private information. Undercover officers pulling stings to stop distracted drivers is a good approach in my opinion because it can reduce possible car accidents.
Link for more information for statistics of the dangers of texting and driving http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/08/dangers-of-texting-and-driving-statistics_n_7537710.html There is an issue that has been happening since I can remember, which is cyberbullying and the ethical issues of cyberbullying by the negativity that has been occurring in social media sites. Cyberbullying is the use of electronic communication to bully a person, typically by sending messages of an intimidating or threatening nature. I have a Facebook account since I was in high school and on my newsfeed, I have seen my friends cyberbullying other people online. Not only my friends were involved in cyberbullying, but strangers and unanimous users were creating fake accounts to “expose” their victims at the same time by typing false information about them for their own entertainment and to make their victims feel terrified. Today, I still see people getting cyberbullied on Facebook and it has become more common to be exposed in these types of behaviors and it is unfortunate for the victims to suffer from that embarrassment since everyone online are easily manipulated to think that everything mentioned on the internet is true. There are many reasons that cyberbullying can occur, but the main reasons are griefing, drama, harassment and relationship violence. Griefing is when someone irritates and annoys you online, but the victim does not know the person due to the fact that the person does not have a profile picture or an unrecognizable name. The griefing event is generally isolated, continuing until the griever has gotten the reaction he or she wants. Drama is a common type of bullying that often occurs in school, but it spreads on social media. Unlike griefing, drama happens when the bully and the victim personally know each other. Harassment is a “traditional” type of bullying, which the bully is “picking on” their victim online. Drama and harassment sounds that both mean the same thing and have the same result, but the key difference between drama and harassment is that in drama people involved have the same amount of “social power” that there are witnessed by many people. Harassment is more threatening such as abusive text messages where rarely there is no witnesses at all. Relationship violence has been spread throughout social media when a relationship has ended or in a rocky situation. Often mostly women are being cyberbullied by their former partner by threatening them by uploading photos and screenshots of their text messages on social media. I have seen this type of behavior on social media from people that I don’t know and what amazed me is that there are many users looking at the photos and laughing at the situation. The users make the situation worse by mocking the victim and calling the victim names that I cannot add in my blog. People that are being cyberbullied often commit suicide and fall into depression due to the fact that they feel vulnerable since anything that is posted on the internet, it stays on the internet permanently. I have seen and read many articles about cyberbullied victims committing suicide and it makes me angry that someone has the nerve to bully people online and not feel any type of remorse. Cyberbullying is becoming more common to occur since technology is advancing each year since people can access the internet in almost every electronic device.
Link for more information about cyberbullying 4/20/2017 8 Comments smartphone addiction (blog #12)Mostly everyone owns a smartphone and it is useful for looking for an address, surfing the web, managing your bank account, and playing games. It does feel good owning a smartphone and it seems that we cannot leave our home without it. Everywhere we go and most locations such as fast food restaurants, retail stores, and maybe even small businesses offer promotions that you can scan QR codes with your smartphone to get a discount of a certain item or a food discount. Every day you see a lot of people walking around starring at their smartphones or just holding them in their hands. It seems that we have to have the necessity to own a smartphone and that we cannot live without one. There are some concerns that experts have that if people are spending too much time on their phone. According to an article from techaddinction.ca, approximately 72% of people said they are rarely more than five feet away from their handset at any time. This is what is known as nomophobia (an abbreviation of no mobile phobia); the fear that being away from your phone somehow disconnects you from the world. As with many forms of addiction, smartphone addiction is also something that often stems from other underlying emotional and psychological issues. Overuse of a handset can be a crutch that people with post-traumatic stress, attention deficit and social anxiety lean on too. The reason that it can cause stress and depression is basically logging on social media, which a user can be exposed with graphic content of violence, sees the achievements that a user shares with the world that can cause them to lose their self-esteem, and reading other users opinions that they don’t agree with. There are also consequences regarding to smartphone addiction when in regards to our bodies physically and mentally. Staring at a screen, for instance, prevents the brain from releasing something that is called melatonin, our natural sleep chemical. As a result, our bodies don't register that we are tired. Overuse of smartphones leads to interrupted sleeping patterns and means that we do not function as well throughout the day, affecting our abilities to work. Children are also being affected with smartphone addiction. Children that has possession of a smartphone tend to use it to play games and spend hours on a smartphone, which they lose interest of playing outside and interacting with everyone around them. It can be the other way around when an adult is distracted on their smartphone and a child wants to get their attention by poking them or yelling at them if the adult does not reply. It is proven that most of the time the adults reply in an angry tone towards the child because they feel annoyed and bothered. Smartphones are a useful and a good device that we can own, but we have to limit ourselves into using them and avoid having our lives sucked in our smartphones 24/7. As studies has shown that we are a generation that have an addiction to technology and slowly we are allowing smartphones to control our personal life’s.
Link for more information about smartphone addiction Technology has been revolutionizing each year that people and companies are looking forward to try new smart gadgets to witness the power in technology. 3D printers are the most astonishing piece of technology that surprises consumers by its ability to print many things from toys to guns. For pharmaceutical companies, 3D printers are being tested to print prescription drugs so that the pharmaceutical companies can later sell the printed drugs to patients. Today, 3D printers are now available for purchase, but the pharmaceutical companies are suggesting that patients can have access to make their own prescription pills. It sounds that 3D printing drugs is a one step forward for patients and pharmaceutical companies to engage in making pills, but it can be a risk for a patient to be making drugs in their home and can create 3D printers into a personal drug dealer or the 3D printer might fall into the wrong hands. Although that the public does not have access for 3D printers that print drugs, there is an ongoing debate of the pros and cons that if it’s a good idea that if the public can be trusted owning a powerful machine that prints prescription drugs. 3D printers began into play since the 1980’s as an experimental invention to revolutionize modern technology. In 1986, Charles “Chuck” Hull invented a stereo lithography machine, that was known as the earliest 3D printers according to Elizabeth Matias and Bharat Rao. In 1988, another inventor named Scott Crump invented fused deposition modeling (FDM), which is known as the second invented 3D printer. Seventeen years after the second 3D printer was invented, designers and engineers quietly evolved and developed more 3D printers. In 2005, Dr. Gordon started a RepRap project, which is an open source community with the goal of making 3D printing technologies accessible to all. As I mentioned before about the controversy about whether let people own their own 3D printer to print drugs has been focused on more about the risk if a drug abuser has access to this printer and begins to have his or her addiction worse. The best option would be for patients to not be given the opportunity to own a 3D printer to print their own prescription drugs. Pharmaceutical companies are still developing more research to print out more 3D pills, so it is not safe for patients to print drugs. Pharmaceutical companies are only predicting the future and are working on making it a reality. Pharmaceutical companies are not aware or they don’t care about people that have drug addiction problems and are preparing to allow people to 3D print drugs. Statistics in the US, patients and non- patients that are drug addicts overdose from prescription pills die each year and imagine the chaos that can occur if patients and non-patients can print drugs to possibly double the number of drug overdose and deaths. The ethical framework that describes each stakeholder (pharmaceutical companies, patients, and non-patients) are Ethical Egoism. Ethical Egoism means the rightness of an act is determined solely by how much it benefits the agent doing it. Some defenders of ethical egoism argue that we are always motivated by our own self-interest, whether we realize this or not. Pharmaceutical companies argue that they’re rebuilding the future in medicine and care deeply for their patients, but individuals in pharmaceutical companies only see interest in themselves by selling prescription drugs to drug dealers only to satisfy themselves with money and greed.
3D printing drugs link for more information As I am constantly reading articles from different news networks, there has been once certain topic that has caught my attention, which is concerns of videogame development and accusations of gamers behaving in a sense that they are not themselves. Most of us have played videogames when were young and quite often we played videogames that are M rated (Mature audiences that are over 17 and up), so we see content that we are not supposed to look at such as gun violence, drugs, sex, prostitution, and profanity. I can say that it is quite true because when you go on YouTube and watch someone play Grand Theft Auto 5, you can hear kids on the mic playing these types of games. I used to play violent videogames since I was a child and I saw it as a fun game, which they are. I am not encouraging anyone to let children and young teens to play these games, but my point is I seen articles about people accused of school shootings and killing individuals that the media links their acts by playing violent videogames. For example, a 20-year-old man named Adam Lanza who was responsible for shooting at the Sandy Hook elementary school was a frequent player of violent first-person shooter video games. It was said his existence largely involved playing violent computer video games in his bedroom. The media strongly insist that violent videogames are responsible for unexpected tragic events that suspects feel “encouraged” to apply from what they control in front of a TV screen or computer to harm innocent people. Does playing violent games desensitize you to violence? The videogame industries argue that they are not responsible for those tragic incidents that occur. I think that the videogame industries have the right to defend themselves because they are not encouraging anyone to harm others and it is unnecessary for people to point fingers at them when the suspect was known to play violent videogames.
The ethical issues in videogames does not just only revolve in violence but in accusations of discriminating women in certain videogame titles. In M rated videogames, most women are routinely abused, bullied, and harassed while the industry’s largest companies tend to remain silent. Like in Grand Theft Auto 5 or any other previous Grand Theft Auto videogame, there are strip clubs that women are working and asking men for lap dances also when your character is driving you see women dressed as prostitutes with a cigarette on their hand trying to get your attention. In my opinion, it has become common to see women in videogames that are portrayed that way, so mostly anyone considers it as a routine gameplay. There was an article that I read last semester that a woman was playing a game using a Virtual Reality headset that she can see other users character in the game that some man approached her and began touching her inappropriately that she felt sexually assaulted even though she was not physically assaulted. Can this incident be linked on how women are portrayed in M rated videogames? Who knows, but it can be a possibility, but we cannot just assume that it’s the reason. Link to article on woman sexually assaulted in the VR game Link to article on 14 Mass Murders Linked to Violent Video Games 3/31/2017 3 Comments are smartwatches safe? (BLOG #9)Technology is advancing each year that we seem to begin to adapt with technological changes. Now most people in the United States own smartphones that use their phones cameras most of the time that seem to replace digital cameras that I can remember when digital cameras were used like 5-8 years ago. There was the time that computers were the only thing that the public can access to the internet. Now we have our smartphones, game systems, smart TV’s, printers, refrigerators, cameras, and USB Flash Drives that can access that can access the internet, so mostly everyone can easily access the internet. I heard from my professor for my intro to Networking class that in a few years there is going to be toasters and chairs that will have the ability to access the internet. It is unbelievable that some common items that we use in a daily basis can be upgraded with internet access. Instead of focusing on the future, we should see what kind of technological devices that are trending now for example smartwatches. I have never imagined that we are going to replace an ordinary watch for a smartwatch. A smartwatch is a mobile device with a touchscreen display, designed to be worn on the wrist. Smartwatches are popular among tech savvy consumers, which I don’t blame them for enjoying a device that can easily give you directions from point A to point B, can send emails or text messages, use voice search, get notifications from your favorite news cast, play music, shop, and book a flight. Although a smartwatch is a must have device, but there are some flaws that smartwatches can harm or endanger privacy to consumers. Companies find ways to collect and use personal health, location and purchasing data found on the wearable devices of their customers and workers. According to an article from ComputerWorld, “The broader privacy concern is that information collected from various [wearable] sources is increasingly being combined to create profiles from individual users and draw inferences about their future actions, preferences, etc." To be clearer about the invasion of privacy that companies cause from users is that smartwatches makes it seem that any personal information that is stored in the smartwatch can remain anonymous, but that is not the case most of the time. For example, the smartwatch has a health feature that it has monitor and record a user’s heartbeat and their current health, so if companies gather people’s health data from the smartwatches, it can possibly jeopardize a person’s employment if they have bad health. About some other ethical issue involving health concerns is the side effects that smartwatches can cause to users that we seem to not be aware of. Radiation that is released by these gadgets can cause reduced sperm counts, eye irritation, headaches, reduced appetite, nausea, mood swings and sleep disruption. According to an interview that was conducted to Dr. Pandey from regards to health concerns, “The Electro-Magnetic Radiation (EMR) and radio signals, which are released continuously by these gadgets, have become one of the most toxic forms of pollution and a major health concern. With the constant use of cell phones and electronic devices, which offer near constant connectivity, hazardous toxins are wreaking havoc on the human body slowly and surely”. I am not encouraging people not to buy a smartwatch, but I want inform everyone that it might cause health issues and invasion of privacy when you get your hands on one.
Social media has pretty much consumes a good part of our life’s for more than over a decade by its ability to chat with our friends, family, and making new friends. Today, social media is easier to have access with our smartphones and even a smart watch can access social media. According to Business Insider, 25% of the time spent on mobile apps is attributed to social networking. Mostly everyone already has a social media account and constantly checks what their friends and family are up to twenty-four hours a day. Technically that is true half of the time, but it seems that the other half makes it fully true if the user keeps on getting notifications from their friends every post they make that the user can see what it’s happening 3 hours later. Social media will ask for your personal information so mostly everyone can see it displayed on your profile, that’s if you have your private settings so only your friends can see it. No one has a problem to expose their personal information on social media such as where they live, their full name, etc. I am going to use Facebook as a primary example to state my point. I had Facebook for many years and the only way to know more about someone is by reading what another user allows me to know about them. Today, it’s on a whole other level since mostly everyone gives you their current location. Users don’t mind doing these things, but they’re not aware of that they are exposing themselves too much on social media and are putting their privacy at risk. For example, some users tend to post pictures about their expensive jewelries, electronics, and stacks of money to show the world of their personal belongings. The most common one is users posting their current location and letting everyone know in social media that they will be gone from their home for a while and posting where they’re going. On Facebook, I see this all of the time and I ask myself that they have no idea that they’re giving away their privacy without them realizing it. At first, it does not seem like it’s a big deal, but if you think this through a little deeper, you will realize the seriousness of this privacy issue. There are people on social media that are lurking on other profiles to whether stalk someone or steal from them. The reason that posting pictures of your expensive things and money is dangerous because someone in interest can steal your home. It’s like allowing everyone into your home to see your stuff. The reason that posting your current location is dangerous is because some stranger can go to your current location and stalk you. It’s better if users do not overshare every piece of their daily life to protect their privacy. The most important thing to remember about anything you post online is that it is no longer yours and no longer private. Though your privacy settings protect your posts one day, the social platform can change those settings and your posts are now public. Therefore, it is a good idea not to post anything you don’t want public on social media. Keep that in mind the next time you share something online. Social media has pretty much consumes a good part of our life’s for more than over a decade by its ability to chat with our friends, family, and making new friends. Today, social media is easier to have access with our smartphones and even a smart watch can access social media. According to Business Insider, 25% of the time spent on mobile apps is attributed to social networking. Mostly everyone already has a social media account and constantly checks what their friends and family are up to twenty-four hours a day. Technically that is true half of the time, but it seems that the other half makes it fully true if the user keeps on getting notifications from their friends every post they make that the user can see what it’s happening 3 hours later. Social media will ask for your personal information so mostly everyone can see it displayed on your profile, that’s if you have your private settings so only your friends can see it. No one has a problem to expose their personal information on social media such as where they live, their full name, etc. I am going to use Facebook as a primary example to state my point. I had Facebook for many years and the only way to know more about someone is by reading what another user allows me to know about them. Today, it’s on a whole other level since mostly everyone gives you their current location. Users don’t mind doing these things, but they’re not aware of that they are exposing themselves too much on social media and are putting their privacy at risk. For example, some users tend to post pictures about their expensive jewelries, electronics, and stacks of money to show the world of their personal belongings. The most common one is users posting their current location and letting everyone know in social media that they will be gone from their home for a while and posting where they’re going. On Facebook, I see this all of the time and I ask myself that they have no idea that they’re giving away their privacy without them realizing it. At first, it does not seem like it’s a big deal, but if you think this through a little deeper, you will realize the seriousness of this privacy issue. There are people on social media that are lurking on other profiles to whether stalk someone or steal from them. The reason that posting pictures of your expensive things and money is dangerous because someone in interest can steal your home. It’s like allowing everyone into your home to see your stuff. The reason that posting your current location is dangerous is because some stranger can go to your current location and stalk you. It’s better if users do not overshare every piece of their daily life to protect their privacy. The most important thing to remember about anything you post online is that it is no longer yours and no longer private. Though your privacy settings protect your posts one day, the social platform can change those settings and your posts are now public. Therefore, it is a good idea not to post anything you don’t want public on social media. Keep that in mind the next time you share something online.
3/10/2017 3 Comments the dangers of webcams (blog #7)Today, laptops and computer monitors have built in webcams. Webcams are convenient for online face to face communication with our families and friends, which Skype is our resource that we rely on for online communication. It is common now that companies are using webcams to communicate with employees and employers by conducting job interviews and an online conference. Even though, people have been using webcams for more over a decade, now it has been revolutionized that it is required to own a webcam since companies, schools, and families from long distance tend to communicate by using a webcam. What I am curious about is that when I go to school, I see people using their laptops and I see a small paper or sticker covering their webcam. When I was in community college, I saw the same thing from other students and now it has become a common thing to do. I heard that the reason for covering their webcam is that other people might access their webcam and begin watching them. To be more specific, people are concerned that hackers, FBI, and the U.S. Government are constantly getting access to webcams to spy on someone in front of their webcam. Mostly everyone that owns a computer with a built-in webcam are concerned about their privacy and are fearful about someone watching them, so in order to protect their privacy, they cover their webcams. There has been reports from victims that there were occasions that they have been stalked from their webcam. Victims of webcam hacks have seen images and videos of themselves regularly in different states of undress or in compromising situations – uploaded to websites. On top of this, there have been multiple instances of hackers using these unlawful techniques to spy on people they know. Hackers tend to have many techniques on how to hack someone’s webcam. The most common malware that hackers rely on is Remote Access Trojan (RAT). RAT is a malware program that includes a back door for administrative control over the target computer. RATs are usually downloaded invisibly with a user-requested program such as a game or sent as an email attachment. This gives the opportunity for hackers to hide in the application and wait for the chance to begin hacking the webcams. As for the FBI, the FBI has long been able to activate a computer’s camera without triggering the ‘recording light’ to let the owner know the webcam is on. According to an article from Daily Mail, “The FBI team use the same technique as ratters, by infecting the computer with a malicious software – ‘malware – through phishing”. By sending an email with a link, which could be to a website, an image or a video, the user is tricked into downloading a small piece of software onto their machine. It is shocking that even the FBI has the nerve to spy on people and breaking their privacy rights. After researching about who is hacking into webcams to spy on users, I can say that I don’t blame people that cover their webcams to avoid from being spied on also this is a concern about our privacy. The cyberworld is a mysterious place that there is not knowing what people are doing, so you have to be prepared for the unexpected.
3/2/2017 2 Comments tracking down online scammersEvery day, people buy stuff online such as clothes, phones, videogames, TV’s, watches, iPAD’s, etc.. . When we buy stuff online, we expect to have a great experience and have a good satisfaction with our purchases. We expect that our products are well sealed and the product/s are going to be delivered on the day it is promised or sooner. The most visited websites that we use to buy stuff online is Amazon and eBay. Although, Amazon sells products based on their stocks from their warehouse, there are people that use Amazon that sell their stuff. eBay is perfectly known as a website that people and private businesses all over in the United States that sell their stuff. Customers online are attracted by the good quality of the items and their low price compared to retail price. Although, shopping online is recommended by any rather than going to retails stores and pay double for the same item, there is a serious issue that haunts online customers which they fall victims of being scammed by sellers. eBay has a negative reputation from customers that report from being scammed. Scammers like to target new members to take advantage of their unfamiliarity with how eBay or PayPal works. New members can be easily tricked into thinking there is a special Web site they should make payments through, which is in fact a fake site set up by a scammer or they may be tricked more easily into using a fake escrow company. The complaints are generally that eBay fails to respond when a claim is made. Fraud committed by eBay includes selling counterfeit merchandise, shill bidding, shipping different items, knowingly selling stolen goods, selling bootleg merchandise, and PayPal fraud. The most common scams that are happening are electronics. People that are buying smartphones from the internet are likely getting scammed by the buyer, which the buyer gives a customer a similar phone that looks like the actual phone that has similar functions and less GB’s, but the customer is paying full price. Shill bidding is the practice of attempting to increase the final selling price of an auction item by entering a phony bid on one's own product. In society sellers are known for scamming buyers off from their money, but sellers are not the only ones that scam people. Some buyers tend to have the ability to scam sellers as well. There are certain ways that a buyer can scam a targeted seller. On eBay, a potential buyer will contact you and offer to make an immediate payment if you settle the transaction outside of eBay. The transaction will go smoothly, until they contact you afterwards and complain of a defective product, false advertisement or dishonest eBay listing. They will blackmail you into paying them or else they’ll contact eBay and get you banned. The reason that scammers want to buy that product outside of eBay is because if the seller complains to eBay that the buyer scammed him or her, eBay cannot do anything about it because the transaction was not done in their system. Therefore, if you are shopping online or selling an item, you should be aware that there are scammers that are waiting to take advantage of you or anybody else. Thus, everyone has the free will to take the risk and buy something that the price is too good to be true, but keep your eyes peeled and don’t become involved in scamming people.
|
Fernando MadrigalHello, my name is Fernando Madrigal and I am a Junior at CSUMB. My major is Computer Science with my concentration in Network and Security. I recently transferred from Hartnell Community College last fall. Archives
May 2017
Categories |